Wednesday, February 3, 2010

AN OPEN LETTER TO "DR. LILY VON MARCAB"

Dr. Lily von Marcab:


While I think you are a total scumbag for your "Anonymous" activities related to hentai, pedobear, and other numerous other perversions, the retaliation you are about to receive stems from your cyber-stalking and cyber-bullying.

Ever since your hate group began its attacks against the members of the Church of Scientology, you have stood out as an instigator. As a leader within your group, you share the guilt for its collective crimes. In fact, many would agree that you're even guiltier than most. And now, your own dirty tactics will be used to do to you what you have already done to many innocent people.

One of the BIG LIES OF ANONYMOUS is that you "only oppose the organization of Scientology." Your established and well documented record of religious persecution exposes that fraudulent claim. Your hate group has committed countless acts of harassment, intimidation, cyber-mischief, stalking, and worse. Which is why, knowing what I do about you and your cyber-bully cult, it should come as no surprise that I have no remorse for what has been done, and for what will be done. In other words, you deserve what's coming.

Not surprisingly, your Anonymous cohorts failed to stand up for you and stop all of this. All they had to do was make a small contribution. BUT, since I didn't get the $9.95 to order the Starbucks VIA™ Ready Brew I was anticipating, it's now time to follow through with the original threat. Just not here. Not on this blog. Not in a place where it will be traced to this posting (I'm very aware of your Cult's Litigious Nature).

You lose. Game over. Thanks for playing.





Tom Newton

29 comments:

  1. Can you spell blackmail Tom, you are criminal of the most crazed kind *shakes head* I pity you I really really do

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sure. Take sides with the pedophilia-peddling hatemonger.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have no proof she has engaged in illegal activities, but you are committing an illegal act right now by trying to black mail her. Last time I checked liking hentai etc is not a crime, its a little weird but they sell that stuff everywhere even right here in Sydney so its not illegal. You just like to point fingers and yell about other people's short coming so that others won't see yours, quite sad really. You think that by painting Lily as bad enough of a person people will not see that you are committing the crime of blackmail, just like you think by making me look like a satanist it will make you look less insane. Bad news Tom ITS NOT WORKING LOL

    ReplyDelete
  4. "You have no proof she has engaged in illegal activities, but you are committing an illegal act right now by trying to black mail her."

    She's a pedophile. I have plenty of proof. Furthermore, I have tons of supporting documentation of her cyber-stalking.

    She's a dangerous, evil woman and deserves to loser her job, her friends, and possibly even time in a federal prison.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Then you too deserve time in prison for blackmailing also I would love to see this proof of her being a pedophile, have you found child porn in her home have you seen her doing inappropriate things with children? I don't think so, also of cyber stalking what you do you call what you are doing to me huh? Again pointing and yelling to try and hide your ACTUAL crimes, poor Tommy

    ReplyDelete
  6. ^People who adore hentai are by definition, pedophiles.

    Also, there are many, many, many websites which consist of information on Scientologists which has been pooled by Anonymous members. In other words, EVIDENCE OF CYBER-STALKING.

    When you posted a certain Scientologists' personal data on your twitter, as a member of an anti-Scientologist group, you were engaging in cyber-stalking and inciting cyber-harassment.

    YOU ARE A CRIMINAL.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Er I am no criminal that man gave us his business card and his information is readliy available on white pages.com, it doesn't take a "stalker" to find that info especially when HE GAVE IT TO US. Lily might have cyber stalked people, but I certainly haven't what was posted on my twitter stopped become private information the second it was posted on white pages.com It is public information which any joe blow has the right to view, so just keep trying Tommy, you're still the criminal

    ReplyDelete
  8. hey tomnigger, im going to keep flagging this blog again till you get banned cocksucker. enjoy your fail bitch

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://www.whitepages.com.au/wp/li/david-lardner-lawyers--kingston-nsw-N04W.html look him up yourself, see easy as pie and PUBLIC

    ReplyDelete
  10. ^As an admitted member of a cyber-stalking activist group, you know FULL WELL that your actions were anything but innocent.

    Don't insult my intelligence. With Anonymous' record of cyber-stalking and harassment, how could posting his information be anything BUT an act of instigation.

    You are a coward for hiding behind such a flimsy rationalization. How about I post up Lily's publicly available information here? Or a link to her employer's website where her real name is listed? Or what about this--how about I post the white pages link to Tory Christman's personal data?

    Would that too be okay with you, you disingenuous little sneak?

    ReplyDelete
  11. People who adore hentai are by definition, pedophiles.

    Riiiiight.

    From the DSM-IV-TR (revised):

    Diagnostic criteria for 302.2 Pedophilia

    A. Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger).

    B. The person has acted on these urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.

    C. The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.


    Funnily enough, there doesn't seem to be a single mention of hentai. So where exactly are you getting this "definition" from anyhow? :)

    ReplyDelete
  12. ^If a man has a copy of a sexually exploitative photo of a child, and he uses it in his solitary sexual gratification, then he is a pedophile.

    The fact that you'd bring up DSM IV to protect pedophiles is inherently disgusting. You are a human pig.

    Moreover, that same bible you are quoting from used to label homosexuals as mentally ill. Are you in agreement with that, you pedophile apologist?

    ReplyDelete
  13. They use fake names because they don't want to be found, Mark Hanna told us who he was, his profession and gave us his card. If you seek these people out and there personal information out when they clearly don't want to be found that is stalking. I didn't seek out Mark Hanna he presented himself to us and Tory and Lily have kept their information private by using aliases. The fact that you and the cult have found info on Lily when she tried so hard to keep it private indicates that you are stalking her. It doesn't matter if she did or didn't stalk people herself the fact of the matter here is that you are trying to blackmail her, which is a crime. So even if Lily is a criminal, you are as well.
    Also it clearly states on my twitter page that I did not place that information on there to instigate anything it was merely information,in fact I recall asking people not to use the information illegally, but I am not responsible what people do with information they could have found for themselves.
    So you're still a criminal and I still have done nothing wrong and am looking better by the second :)

    ReplyDelete
  14. ^OH!!!! So you only put the information there because it was already public....Hmmm. Sounds believable. Considering that Anonymous is known for stalking, harassing, cyber-libel, and worse, why would anybody think that one of their members posting the personal data of one of their targets would constitute a suggestion of any kind?

    Lol. I can't believe I made the mistake of using logic and examining facts and Anonymous' history. My bad.

    Silly me. Imagine, drawing such an UNLIKELY conclusion. Despite the overwhelmingly abundant evidence supporting the logical conclusion, there is really no reason to think that this time isn't an exception. I'm so glad that you could straighten this out. WheW!

    Isn't it wonderful how hate groups can just "turn off the hate" and be completely innocent like this? hahahahhhahahhhahha.

    God. I really need to rethink my approach. All this logic and common sense and research is simply leading me to bad conclusions. For example, cyber-stalkers aren't instigating another attack just because they announce it, nor are pedophiles pedophiles just because they love simulated child porn! LOL HAHHHA ALALLALALLALALAL LOLOLOLO HAHHAHA !

    Wow. I love making no sense at all! I guess this is what it feels like to be a brainless liberal. weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

    ReplyDelete
  15. If a man has a copy of a sexually exploitative photo of a child, and he uses it in his solitary sexual gratification, then he is a pedophile.

    Well, highly probable. It would definitely be a red flag! Facilitating the abuse of children (through file sharing) is almost as bad as abusing them outright. But anyhow, what has this got to do with hentai?

    The fact that you'd bring up DSM IV to protect pedophiles is inherently disgusting. You are a human pig.

    Lol. You taking the moral high-ground. That's rich! I'm simply taking you to task for stating that: "People who adore hentai are by definition, pedophiles".

    Your confected moral outrage is transparent. Although I'm sure there are many tabloid "current affairs" programs that could use your skills. Have you thought about being disgusted by other things? Dole bludgers..."queue jumpers"...teenagers...?

    Moreover, that same bible you are quoting from used to label homosexuals as mentally ill. Are you in agreement with that, you pedophile apologist?

    That same "bible" got RID of that label (Thank Gosh!). Also, I have plenty of criticisms of the DSM, but you were the one that brought up definitions, not I. If you have an alternative source to back up your assertion that: "People who adore hentai are by definition, pedophiles", then please...share. :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Oh I should add, that since you've clearly labeled "Lily Von Marcab" as a pedophile, if you go ahead and name them now, you will undoubtedly be opening yourself up to a defamation charge.

    Oh and "hentai" is NOT proof. I mean you can try, but you'd be laughed out of court.

    Just lettin' you know. :)

    ReplyDelete
  17. The first step to fixing a problem is admitting you have one, good for you Tom for taking that first step and acknowledging you that you make no sense.
    Allow me to help you make sense of what I have said. At no point did I say please go and prank or harrass Mark Hanna, if that was done its not my problem because a 5 year old could have found that info especially when it was placed in the 5 year olds HAND IN BUSINESS CARD FORM. Now in your world of no sense you are grasping onto this idea that I did or said all this for a reason, and that reason was to harrass Mark Hanna. Tom I don't care what goes on in your obviously disturbed mind and you can think whatever you want but I know that I did not post that information for the purpose you describe.
    I also think at this time, we need to discuss your growing fixation with me, its getting a bit out of hand don't you think? I mean you are so obesessed with me, that you can't see that what you are accussing "Anonymous" and myself of doing YOU are doing. You talk about libel and cyber-stalking but you do the same to me and others and this is right and makes sense in your world. But here in the real world you just look loony and people don't take you seriously they just laugh and feel sorry for you. Tom even I don't take you seriously I only talk to you because its a laugh and the more I talk to you the more famous I and the truth about scientology get.
    You should get some help because I think soon you might go off the deep end

    ReplyDelete
  18. "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hentai


    The word "hentai" has a negative connotation to the Japanese and is commonly used to mean "sexually perverted".

    Hentai is perceived as "dwelling" on sexual fetishes, including:

    Incest
    Coprophilia
    Shotacon (PEDOPHILIA)"



    So again, explain to me how PEDOPHILIA isn't PEDOPHILIA. Again, as I have noted before, you are a pedophile apologist and a manipulator of words.

    ReplyDelete
  19. wow Tom's claim to fame is that he is a bit better than a not really pedophile, doesn't matter Tom you still broke the law when you set up a paypal account to blackmail her with

    ReplyDelete
  20. The word "hentai" has a negative connotation to the Japanese and is commonly used to mean "sexually perverted".

    Hentai is perceived as "dwelling" on sexual fetishes, including:

    Incest
    Coprophilia
    Shotacon (PEDOPHILIA)"

    So again, explain to me how PEDOPHILIA isn't PEDOPHILIA. Again, as I have noted before, you are a pedophile apologist and a manipulator of words.


    Well, I'm saying that that does not meet the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. My gosh, you do have trouble with comprehension!

    Also, ambiguities regarding the translation of the word "hentai", would be ripped to shreds in court. Depictions of "sexual perversion" does not generalize to the viewer being a sexual pervert themselves - particularly if there are no actual people in the images.

    Now, if you have a problem with this, or wish to have hentai treated the same as photographs of ACTUAL sexual abuse of children, then perhaps you should talk to your local MP (or rather, congressman, or whoever are the law makers in your jurisdiction), and advocate for a change in the law. Just think of me as your friendly neighborhood legal adviser - albeit one who only really knows about libel. :)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Oh [s]witch! You bring up a good point! After all:

    Extortion = crime

    Viewing hentai = not a crime

    Now if only them pesky laws would cohere to "Tom's" view of reality, then all would be well in his tiny world. :)

    Darn democratic rule of law! :P

    ReplyDelete
  22. ^

    Hello Pedophile Apologist. By your own admission and your own twisted illogic, you wouldn't have a problem with children getting sodomized with broomsticks as long as the law didn't specifically ban the use of broomsticks in child-sodomization. That is how perverted your mind is. You are the worst type of liberal. I'd go so far as to say that you yourself are not only socially irresponsible, but you are also complicit in the worst kinds of crimes against the innocent. You are pathetic and sick.

    "Laws have been enacted to criminalize "obscene images of children, no matter how they are made," for inciting abuse.[1] An argument is the claim that obscene fictional images portray children as sex objects, thereby contributing to child sexual abuse"

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors

    Maybe you should become a defense attorney and you can defend child molesters, you scumbag.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hello Pedophile Apologist. By your own admission and your own twisted illogic, you wouldn't have a problem with children getting sodomized with broomsticks as long as the law didn't specifically ban the use of broomsticks in child-sodomization.

    Did I say that? (answer: "no") I would have a problem with that, and if it weren't illegal I'd be campaigning to change the law.

    That is how perverted your mind is. You are the worst type of liberal. I'd go so far as to say that you yourself are not only socially irresponsible, but you are also complicit in the worst kinds of crimes against the innocent. You are pathetic and sick.

    And extortion, and labeling someone as a "pedophile" when you have NO evidence that they are, is not?

    "Laws have been enacted to criminalize "obscene images of children, no matter how they are made," for inciting abuse.[1] An argument is the claim that obscene fictional images portray children as sex objects, thereby contributing to child sexual abuse"

    You might notice that these laws are not uniform across jurisdiction. Now, since I'm assuming you're a US citizen you might want to look at: Miller v. California which states:

    However, the Court acknowledged "the inherent dangers of undertaking to regulate any form of expression," and said that "State statutes designed to regulate obscene materials must be carefully limited." The Court, in an attempt to set such limits devised a set of three criteria which must be met in order for a work to be legitimately subject to state regulation:

    * the average person, applying contemporary community standards (not national standards, as some prior tests required), must find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;

    * the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions[1] specifically defined by applicable state law; and

    * the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.


    So now it's up to you to show that the not only does "Lily Von Marcab" possess this material, but that it meets this criteria. Now I can hazard a guess and say that the context you're talking about is a message board and the was strictly satirical - however, if you have evidence to the contrary, then that is another matter.

    Anyhow, all this is somewhat besides the point.

    You're not arguing that they're criminally possessing child porn, you're arguing that possessing these images MEANS that they are a pedophile. Now that's a big leap to take. Possessing sexually explicit images of someone of indeterminate age DOES NOT equal pedophilia. Now it could be evidence for it, if there is corroborating evidence, but alone it is not. Do you see how your own argument has become derailed?

    So, what was the context? How do you know they were using these images for sexual gratification? ...and what evidence do you have for this? You have, after all, asserted that this was the purpose of them possessing this material.

    Maybe you should become a defense attorney and you can defend child molesters, you scumbag.

    No thanks. I mean, I'm flattered that you think I'd be good at it, however I don't really want to become an attorney. I've gone through enough years of university thank-you very much!

    But if I did become one, and were to defend someone in this area of law, it would be artists like Bill Henson, whose arrest over production of "child pornography" was horribly knee jerk and reinforced why Australia's lack of constitutional "freedom of speech" protection is shameful. :)

    ReplyDelete
  24. You defend the indefensible. No matter how clever you think you might be with your structured arguments defending child-rape/ exploitation, nothing you could say will ever make it okay.

    It makes sense that you'd be happy to defend Bill Henson. Sure, his paintings of nude children/ teens were ruled "art", but that's beside the point. The point I've been making ABOUT YOU is that you will always push the envelope in favor of perversion.

    Like a typical liberal deviant, you have no moral compass and honestly, children need to be protected from people like you. Children deserve to be protected from those who would hammer away at the very legal defenses designed to protect them. The only reason you are siding with the exploitation here is that you, as a mindless pervert, will ALWAYS side with evil and filth and degradation because that's what you are.

    The truth is, you know full well what you are doing. You just fail to understand the full ramifications. Does the phrase "useful idiot" mean anything to you?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Tom stop dancing around the fact that you broke the law and that doesn't give you the right to judge Lily no matter how unsavory her tastes are. You have no proof of her engaging in pedophilic activities other than looking at something unsavory which is not actually illegal but you on the other hand have been caught redhanded committing a crime.

    ReplyDelete
  26. You defend the indefensible. No matter how clever you think you might be with your structured arguments defending child-rape/ exploitation, nothing you could say will ever make it okay.

    I'm sorry, when did I defend child-rape/exploitation? I believe the laws you cited concern "obscenity" - not either of the above. Also, I'm staunchly against child abuse in all it's forms, including sexual.

    It makes sense that you'd be happy to defend Bill Henson. Sure, his paintings of nude children/ teens were ruled "art", but that's beside the point. The point I've been making ABOUT YOU is that you will always push the envelope in favor of perversion.

    No, I will always challenge you to defend your assertions, because that's my troll-M.O.

    If you want to make points about ME, then you are mounting an ad hominem argument (against the person, not the argument), which as I've stated earlier, shows that you are insecure about your argumentative skills. You really should work on that. :)

    Like a typical liberal deviant, you have no moral compass and honestly, children need to be protected from people like you.

    Oh, okay. Any evidence I'm a danger to children? :)

    Children deserve to be protected from those who would hammer away at the very legal defenses designed to protect them. The only reason you are siding with the exploitation here is that you, as a mindless pervert, will ALWAYS side with evil and filth and degradation because that's what you are.

    Again, ad hominem. And as I said earlier, I have no desire to become a defense attorney, so really the only thing I'm hammering away at is this blog.

    You might be glad to know then, that nobody who has anything to do with protecting children (which I *do* support), would even look at, let alone garner their opinions from this blog. Doesn't that make you feel better? Whatever is said here is absolutely inconsequential to the welfare of children. :)

    The truth is, you know full well what you are doing. You just fail to understand the full ramifications.

    Right. That I'm trolling someone on a blog that nobody but a handful of "anonymous" reads. I know full well what I'm doing. I'm making you angry and frustrated - and the only person who cares about the outcome of this conversation is YOU. I like them ramifications. :)

    Does the phrase "useful idiot" mean anything to you?

    Yes. It's the small segment of audio directly preceding "46&2" on Tool's ├ćnima album. :)

    ReplyDelete
  27. ^You are a cynical manipulator and a troll.

    I called you out as a kooky liberal and here you are making a TOOL reference. I rest my case.

    ReplyDelete
  28. You are a cynical manipulator and a troll.

    Cynical? Hmmm, sometimes. I have been told that. :)

    Manipulator? I'm not sure about that one. I mean, you're the one who tries to manipulate rebuttals into evidence that I'm a pervert, evil, etc. And tries to manipulate potentially obscene material into evidence for pedophilia. I think you should rethink that one.

    A troll? Most assuredly! Also, unashamedly.

    I called you out as a kooky liberal and here you are making a TOOL reference. I rest my case.

    You don't like tool? Oh what a shame! You're totally missing out. Did you know that the syllabic structure of the lateralus lyrics is actually a Fibonacci sequence? Cool huh? Well, it's cool if you like maths.

    Also, I am kooky...but in the most endearing way! Fortunately, I live in a part of the country that loves it's benign eccentrics! I'm an op-shop queen with an extensive hat collection...oh and handbags. But you already knew that.

    ...and "liberal" has a different meaning over here, but reading across cultural lines I can say that I tend towards the left. Bob Brown for PM! :P

    ReplyDelete

NOTE TO "ANONYMOUS" MEMBERS:

ALL DEATH THREATS AND HOTLINKS TO CHILD-PORNOGRAPHY WEBSITES WILL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO GOOGLE, THE FBI, AND YOUR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.


. - . myspace hit counter